
Members of the United Irish Ex Services Association Australia gather before marching in the Sydney’s Anzac Day parade on April 25.
THE recent Anzac Day commemoration was the 95th anniversary of the beginning of the Gallipoli campaign in Turkey – one of the bloodiest battles in the First World War.
But a row has erupted over film footage of Irish and New Zealand soldiers there being deliberately misidentified as Australians.
Gallipoli was the first major battle for the soldiers of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (Anzac).
Irish soldiers were heavily involved in the campaign from the first day, in both the British and Anzac ranks.
In March, President McAleese laid wreaths in Turkey and paid tribute to the more than 4,000 Irish soldiers who died at Gallipoli.
“The cost to the Turks was dreadful. The cost to the Allies was dreadful. The cost to the Irish became a story lost, suppressed and neglected for many decades in between,” said Mrs McAleese.
An Australian submarine which breached the Turkish defences on April 25th, 1915, was commanded by Dubliner Henry Dacre Stoker, cousin of Dracula author Bram Stoker. But New Zealand military historian Chris Pugsley has accused an Australian War Memorial historian of knowingly labelling soldiers from the 5th Irish Fusiliers fighting at Suvla Bay as Australian.
Dr Pugsley, a lecturer at Britain’s Sandhurst Military Academy, identified the Irish soldiers by comparing a still photograph with the film footage.
He describes the 21-second scene as “perhaps the most iconic trench-fighting sequence that exists, where you see these guys in pith helmets furiously firing away”.
The footage was originally shot by Ellis Ashmead-Bartlett, a British war correspondent, and edited by Australian War Memorial historian Charles Bean in 1919. A five-second scene involving New Zealand soldiers has also been misidentified until now as being Australian.
Dr Pugsley identified the New Zealanders by their distinctive hats – known as “lemon squeezers” – and a diary entry from commanding officer Lieutenant Colonel William Malone that confirmed Ashmead-Bartlett had filmed them.
“He seemed a bit swollen-headed, and full of his own importance,” wrote Lt Col Malone. “I gave him a couple of thrills by taking him to a place open to Turkish fire at about 300 yards’ range.”
Dr Pugsley says the misidentification of the Irish and New Zealand soldiers by Bean was deliberate.
“Gallipoli had become the iconic centrepiece of the Australian achievements in the First World War, and so he looked at all these images and assessed how he could tell the Australian story with them,” he said.
“It wasn’t a mistake, it was deliberate. He wanted to tell the Australian story, and he wanted to tell it in popular terms, and so he used the best images that he had.”
Sydney author Jeff Kildea, whose book Anzacs And Ireland prominently covers the Gallipoli campaign, welcome President McAleese’s recent visit to Turkey.
“I see this as part of an ongoing process of growing recognition of the role of the Irish in the First World War,” he said.
“In Ireland the Gallipoli campaign is largely unknown, and yet Irish troops played a very significant part in it.
“Overall, the Irish lost more than New Zealand at Gallipoli throughout the course of 1915,” said Mr Kildea, who is a practicing barrister and teaches Irish Studies at the University of NSW.
by Pádraig Collins


